Even those workers contributing a decent amount of money to their
company-sponsored plans aren’t likely to meet their income needs for
retirement, the Hewitt study finds.
For the scores of large companies fighting to increase
participation rates in their 401(k) plans, there’s new information that
certainly won’t help their cause: Even those workers contributing a decent
amount of money to their company-sponsored plans aren’t likely to meet their
income needs for retirement.
In fact, the vast majority of
workers—roughly 80 percent—at large corporations will not be able to stash
enough cash to adequately support themselves during retirement, according to a
new study from benefits consulting firm Hewitt Associates.
Hewitt examined the account balances and saving habits of 1.8
million employees at 72 large companies. Factoring in inflation and increases in
medical expenses during retirement, the report estimates that employees will
need to replace an average of 126 percent of their salary at retirement just to
make ends meet.
And yes, that means workers will essentially have to draw a higher income
during retirement than they did during their working years, according to the
Hewitt analysis, largely because fewer companies are now offering health care
coverage to retirees.
Employees who are actively contributing to their
companies’ 401(k) plans can get close to fully replacing their incomes during
retirement—but they’ll still fall well short of what Hewitt considers to be an
adequate savings level. Workers who put an average of 8 percent of their
salaries into their 401(k) over the course of their careers can replace 96
percent of their pre-retirement income at age 65, according to Hewitt, or
roughly 80 percent of what the firm deems necessary to battle inflation and
rising health care costs.
The outlook, however, is significantly worse
for employees who ignore their 401(k) altogether. These workers will only be
able to replace slightly more than half of their final salary during retirement.
(Hewitt also considered Social Security payments and any defined-benefit
coverage an employee may receive, in addition to 401(k) savings.)
"At
this point, it is not clear whether employers or employees fully realize the
extent to which employees need to change their behavior to compensate for the
changes to traditional employer-provided defined-benefit and retiree medical
programs, and to address increasing retiree medical costs," the Hewitt report
states.
Filed by Mark Bruno of Financial Week, a sister
publication of Workforce Management. To comment,
e-mail editors@workforce.com.