|
by Ellen Hoffman
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Due to common pension plan requirements and Social Security rules,
ages 55, 60, 62, and 65 often surface as benchmarks in retirement
planning. But planning for your 70th year and beyond could also be
crucial because of Social Security and tax rules that change when you reach age 70 and 70 1/2.
Social
Security presents the more straightforward issue: Although you can
start receiving your benefit when you turn 62, the underlying formula
will raise your benefit slightly each year -- until you reach 70.
Here's a very simple hypothetical example of the difference that
waiting could make. You were born Jan. 1, 1960, and your current salary
is $150,000. According to the calculator on the Social Security Web
site, your benefit at age 62 would be $1,680 per month in current
dollars. At your full retirement age of 67, the benefit would be $2,425
per month, and at 70, you would receive $2,992. Once you are 70, the
amount would rise with annual cost-of-living adjustments, but there would be no other financial advantage to delaying.
When Can You Withdraw Money?
My previous column, "Timing Your Social Security Benefits"
(BusinessWeek.com, 12/6/07), lays out factors other than your age --
such as your other potential income sources -- to consider before
choosing the date to start your benefit.
The second rule relates to withdrawing money from your retirement accounts. In general, you can remove money from a 401(k) or traditional IRA starting at age 59 1/2, without incurring a 10% penalty. (See IRS Publication 590
for a list of exceptions and for details on all IRA rules.) After this
age, you can start withdrawals any time you want, and for any amount
you want or need.
What many people don't realize is that once
they reach 70 1/2, the decision to withdraw funds is no longer
discretionary. A tax rule mandates you to take out a specified amount
annually -- known as a Required Minimum Distribution
(RMD) -- by Apr. 1 in the year after you turn 70 1/2. This sum is based
on a life expectancy formula for you and a spouse who's your
beneficiary, and you must pay income tax on it. Failure to withdraw
will get you a penalty of 50% of the amount you were supposed to have
taken out. (There is no RMD for withdrawals from a Roth IRA, because your contributions to the account have already been taxed.)
Account-Rich But Cash-Poor
With the Social Security
and RMD rules in play, the size of your income and the size of your tax
bill could both vary quite a bit after you reach age 70, depending on
the choices you make. Take this hypothetical example: Charlie retires
at 70 and receives $2,900 a month in Social Security benefits.
In his first year of taking RMDs he must withdraw $54,000 from the $1.5
million IRA into which he rolled his 401(k) after retiring. This
combined income -- without even considering income from other sources
such as a pension, dividends, or real estate -- will almost certainly
result in having to pay federal income tax of either 50% or 85% on his Social Security benefit, in addition to the income tax on the RMD.
You
should also be aware that if all or most of your income-generating
assets are in the retirement account, no matter how lush the account
is, you can find yourself cash-poor, says Mari Adams, a financial
planner in Boca Raton, Fla. When you need a new car or have to pay for
hurricane damage, you'll have to take money beyond the RMD out of the
account and pay the extra taxes. And the IRS will not credit the amount
of that extra withdrawal toward your next year's RMD.
Adrian
Eddleman, an investment adviser in Jackson, Tenn., points out another
pitfall. "If you live beyond the IRS's life expectancy for you, and
your only investments were all tax deferred
(with RMDs), you may find yourself living on 'Social Security only' in
your latest twilight years." But he emphasizes that although the IRS
makes you take the RMDs, you don't have to spend the money instantly.
You can save it or invest it so it's still there for those years.
The
financial hit from RMDs can hurt regardless of whether you're strapped
for retirement income or not. If your retirement budget is tight, the
taxes can eat into your disposable income.
If you're well off, the taxes will reduce the size of the estate you
can leave to your heirs. Denisa Tova, a financial planner in Colorado
Springs, says, "I see too many people putting money away into
tax-deferred vehicles, not realizing they will be taxed at their
highest ordinary tax rates on all of this money."
Accumulate Assets Outside IRAs
The best way to minimize these taxes on your retirement
savings is to anticipate the problem, and in the years before
retirement, try to accumulate some assets outside of your 401(k)
or traditional IRA. With the current relatively low capital-gains
rates, one option to consider, along with contributions to your 401(k)
or similar retirement account, is to put some of your savings into an
investment account.
While you're still working, another solution is to put some savings into a Roth IRA,
which will allow for tax-free withdrawals when you retire. In 2008 you
may contribute up to $5,000 if your age is below 50; and $6,000 if you
are 50 or older. However, these contributions are subject to income
limits -- in 2008, a Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI)
of $169,000 for taxpayers who are married and filing jointly, or a MAGI
of $116,000 for single taxpayers -- and the amount of your contribution
may be phased out at the higher income levels. If your employer offers
a Roth 401(k),
your contribution is not subject to these income limits, and in 2008
you may put up to $15,500 into a Roth 401(k), or $20,500 if you're 50
or older.
If you're no longer working and your MAGI is less than
$100,000, you can convert some or all of your traditional IRA into a
Roth, but you do have to pay income tax on the amount converted.
Eddleman points out, however, if you wait until 2010 to convert, you
could reduce the tax bite under a special one-year provision in the Tax
Increase Prevention & Reconciliation Act of 2006. This provision
offers a tax benefit to those who convert in 2010: to postpone paying
the tax that year and then pay it in two equal installments, in 2011
and 2012. (Caveat: This or any other tax law can always be changed with
little notice.)
A popular saying suggests "70 is the new 50," and
that seems increasingly to be true. If you agree, you should also
realize the appropriate time for retirement financial planning extends
beyond the traditional deadline for ending your work life, and probably
for as long as you live and need income to pay your bills.
Copyrighted, Business Week. All rights reserved.
|